religious knowledge

the paper first addresses the confilict between religion and science, together with some solutions proposed. it then proposes religious knowledge as an epistimological field which obey the laws of empirical sciences. the solution put forward addresses a deep_rooted confilict,as it is in reference to one concerning scientific and religious propositions. moreover, it does not ignore the confilict between science and technology on one hand, and the crystalization of the aims of religions on the other hand. in fact the proposed ways all faces difficulties; these include the distinction of thier scope, the difference in objectives and languages, the negation of the realization and negation of the factuality of the language of science. in this paper, it is expressed that for the religious knowledge to have a logically acceptable impression, and to the other deficiencies. it demandes to have a special stance in such matters as the language of religion,provability and refutability of scientific and religious staements, the place of convictions in matters of religion and science, and the role of unscientific matters in the body of science and religion. though religious knowledge renders simple and multifacet pictures,if it wishes to find a place in the sphere of scientific and to follow the laws of empirical sciences,it must find a place in the current accademic traditions. the realization of this depends on the scientists' awareness of the secret factors which contribute to the development of science. on the other hand,it is also dependent on their awareness of basic outlooks on the universe,man,and the ends of life. hence, one can not expect of religious knowledge to stand only on human religious beliefs but not on the current scientific tradition. hence,religious knowledge is feasible in the hope of which profound reconsideration in the current scientific tradition can be followed by much more profound insight. this can not be expected to appear via a series of logical operations  exnihilio.